Given a choice between the EF-S 24mm in the review or the EF 20mm F2.8 USM, EF 24mm f2.8 IS USM, EF 28mm F1.8 USM, EF 28mm F2.8 IS USM, EF 35mm F2.0 IS USM, which is the better option? The 100-400 has performed flawless for 10 years in these conditions. Peter, thanks for the kind feedback, and Im glad you are having a good experience with the lens as well. SONY A-PROii underwater housing RENTAL. This will be the 7D II. Youve already got yourself a pretty great lens, though. My friends mocked or pitied me a bit for that decision, but it was perfect: Small, lightweight, long battery life, great weather sealing, gps, wifi, incredible low light performance and great overall image quality. Best ragards like the L it's full-frame compatible, unlike the 18-135 STM. Im more concerned about future needs, like lens options and compatibility. I'm not a professional photographer, just an amateur so i don't have the luxury to spend too much for lenses so i'm looking for kind of a budget ones. I would like to confirm Martons findings on the comparison between 100-400 old vs 100-400 II at 400 mm. Interested in your review. He mentions he is using a 70D about a third of the way into the review. I use the lens with the Canon 5D MkIII camera. The 6D has proved itself to be an excellent events work-horse. Thanks for good review with solid information and samples. Does the rubber ring any better than Sigmas? Which one will be better? Fantastic review. The problem is that all of these are very good lenses. Your review has me convinced this is the lens for me and I will get it eventually, once i've aquired other hardware on my long list. I love to take bird photographs. I look forward to being able to compare the lenses side by side. Will, Im still waiting for Tamron in the US or Canada to get me one. I personally most want a 50mm equivalent of the 35mm f/2 IS; its one of my favorite little primes. I mostly like to do landscape work, but have long wanted a super tele for the occasional wildlife opportunities that come up. Wondering if its worth it. Yep, I got ahead of myself there, mentioning the 6D. Slightly more expensive but it really works on my 6D. Long exposure NR off. I myself figured that 2/3rd of a stop difference between the f/1.4 and this f/2 was negligible, but couldn't find a review backing me up there. 5% off your first order when you sign up for our newsletter, We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience on our website. Thank you for the nice feedback. Greetings from Germany God blessings anyway for a new year. not sure you answered my question about whether you thought it performs great on APS-C sensor compared to full frame? I was already impressed by my Tamron 70-300 SP VC Di, so I have no problem choosing Tamron over Canon if the price and quality are right. Im a hobbyist and am shooting on a crop nikon d5200. I just picked up a refurbished copy on the Canon Direct store for about $100 less than its current new (with rebate) price. Excellent review of a very interesting zoom! Did you or anyone else you know, use this lens on an APS-C sensor body, if so, what kind of results did they have? This is a pretty important lens, so I did my best to cover as many bases as possible. Thank you for an excellent review of this new product. You were fortunate to get one supply isnt quite up to demand. In my opinion in whole range (28-300mm) absolutely minimal usable F value is F/5.6 but better use F/8 or higher if you don't want to throw that lens to the wall because of image quality. would appreciate direct comparison of this new Tamron with the older 200-500 Tamron. Since posting the review I have actually added a chip to my lens so that (after programing) it does add the focal length and a fixed aperture (f/5.6 is what mine is set at) to the camera to record for EXIF data. I recently changed the title to The Covenant Chronicles given my relatively new emersion in to Gods Word through my wonderful church. I think I knew a thing or two about lenses , having all my life worked either with Leica or Rolleiflex , or indeed Linhof , but this one baffles me I have been using a Sigma EXDG 20mm lens (manual focus) on my Canon 5D Mark III set at aperture f/1.8 with shutter set between 5-10 seconds, & ISO 1000 to get some good looking milky way shots but now tempted to purchase and try this 14mm lens at aperture f/2.8 for an even wider night sky shot. Im not alone in getting somewhat inconsistent focus results with the Sigma. Was looking to pre-order from Amplis but that Tamron lens is not found on their website. The 5DIII is considered the better choice if your primary focus is shooting video. (Ambient light, Flash light), Locked when shutter button is pressed halfway. It is funny, but originally bought the 50L in attempt to compensate my Canon 400Ds awful ISO capabilites. Hi Dustin, thank you for this awesome review, I appreciate the effort you put on it. The Tamron 90mm macro seems to be my best choice for my Sony A77. Unless you very quickly release the switch nothing engages at the normal shooting position, while there is a hard stop at super macro. Just wanted to let you know that I now got an adapter that works. I bought a Canon 35mm f2 IS recently and was amazed by its performance (and I have owned and used a lot of great lenses). My current gears: If you are sure that your copy had good AF its possible that my copy was defective or something. I bought my Sony mount 90mm Tamron years ago, and keep turning back to it even with adapters on my 4/3 system. I love this lens. I'll be returning to your site for more soon. I recently ordered the Helios 40-2 and am waiting for delivery from Russia, and of course there are the Jupiter 3 and Jupiter 8 lenses I enjoy so much on my Leicas. Dave, this lens has proven to be surprisingly controversial. Could not find any problem or reason to return the lens. That helped a lot in my decision and I'm now saving up for the Canon 35mm F2 IS USM. No regrets. For portraiture though, I think the Sony set up with their G-Master lenses cant be beat. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Really liked your pics with the Zeiss 15 F2.8. I know exactly what you mean about lenses punching above their spec sheet class, as I found that with the zeiss 50mm Planar I rented a couple years agoloved the look and color of those images (though I wasnt skilled enough to focus consistently even after changing the screen). Thank you, Janne. Hmmm, thats a tough call. Neben der Garantie stehen dir selbstverstndlich auch die gesetzlichen Gewhrleistungsrechte zu. Wondering if their cost cutting shift to manufacture in China is causing some QC issues. Maybe the Canon 35mm f/2 IS or the Tamron 35mm f/1.8 VC would be better choices. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cceUOKLYB9I, Excellent. wow Dustin!!!!!!!! If it is as good as I expect I may add it to my own kit. It will depress that pin and keep it out of your way. I would love to have wider without much size/weight penalty and this seems to fit the billworth a rental to see how well it works for oneself at least. For my work thats a deal breaker and doesnt worth the weight of the lens. This occurred on the 45mm 1.8 and two different copies of the 24-70 2.8. Those that use the 5Ds R extensively seem to really like it, but I dont get the impression it has really been a volume seller, either. It would tempt me but for its lack of IS. Good feedback all around. See here: http://www.samyang-europe.com/index.php/new-products/samyang-filter-holder-sfh-14. I just wanted to point out that you spend a great deal of time extolling the feel, the look and beautiful finish of the lens all perfectly reasonable. Enjoy the lens, Mark. Krister, Im not sure I understand your comment. Carlisle, Thank you, great work! If you dont want to spend the money for both the extender and the 100-400L II, I would go with the Tamron (if you need that reach). *, Beliebte Once you power the camera on and release the lens from its collapsed position you need to move it until the lock engages again at the shooting position. The batteri and SD Cardiff is ok. Do you have any advice? Big. I know you briefly mentioned the Sigma 30mm f1.4 art. Having run both cameras side-by-side and sometimes simultaneously, I can honestly say that sometimes I dont realise which one Im using they are that well matched. I personally feel that much of the criticism was unfairly levelled at what is turning out to be a superb camera with features that are actually quite useful. Hi ..We own both the Tamron 150-600 and the Canon 100-400 mk 2 the canon 100-400 mk2 on the 7d2 outperforms the tamron slightly but put a 1.4x TC mk3 (which we do )on the Canon and the Tamron slightly outperforms the canon plus t/c at 550-600 regarding sharpness AF if great on both if you are wanting to use a 1.4x t/c the 100-400 Mk2 is the way to go as the Mk1 is soft a massive difference in fact ..as with all lenses there is some variation my Tamron is sharp at 600..the Tamron for the money is a great lens the VC is good i can easily hand hold at 600 (960MM) the AF is quick and accurate too yes the canon is superb too my comments only apply to the aps-c sensor size on the 7D2 but both lenses are great on our 7D2 (my wife and I) out of the 2 lenses the 100-400 mk 2 is more versatile being able to focus at less than metre i love both lenses that why we keep them both !! 2x (HD), Modes: Face / Eye Priority in AF, Face Priority in Multi Metering, Regist. I will travel with the eos m3 with the tele photo and my fuji x-pro1 wifh the 35mm for details. Diese wurde Anfang Februar 2022 im Kurzes Update mit Neueinstellung: About a year ago I came across a Helios 44, 58mm f/2 "white" aluminium finish, 13 aperture blades, M39 mount with a M39-M42 adapter, preset aperture, in optically very good shape, that I guess to be about 50 years old. I would personally go with the Tamron for the extra flexibility, though if you feel you need f/1.4 the Sigma is the obvious choice. Indeed this lens really has created quite a stir on various photography forums and elsewhere. Most Zeiss users seem to be pretty devoted to their lenses, so I suspect less are dumping them than you might think. Tamron owes you big. I was very pleased with my Canadian price. 176 ., Rotation Angle: Approx. It would take the e-mount version + a Sony A7 to test that directly. If your priority is reach, Id give the Tamron a try. this lens will rise quality of my images. Du hast ein Problem mit einem bei uns gekauften Produkt oder bist dir unsicher, ob es sich um einen Garantiefall handelt? Many thanks! YOUR CONTENT, ALWAYS CONNECTED: The Alpha 7 IV has livestreaming at up to 4K15p or Full HD 60p without the need for a capture card to keep you connected with your audience at all times.

Sitemap 21

refurbished sony a7iv