With a low volume foot shape, I do not get a perfect foot landing with the shoe shape, but thats a personal note. Toni: Let it be known that the Topo Phantom was my favorite distance running shoe of the past two years and having the opportunity to test the Topo Phantom 2 was a dream come true. I ran a lot of dirt/gravel with the Phantom 2, and the outsole provides enough traction (not great, but good) and some comfort. In terms of upper nothing wrong with Shifts, but overall and especially if you need a broader toe box no contest Phantom. The Phantom is more stable (an important consideration as the Invincible is not the most stable) , has a more durable outsole, and a roomier more polished upper. Both feel flat at slower paces back on the heels with v2 definitely improved in that regard and with said in v2 once off the heels or at faster paces things move along far better than they did in v1. The sensation isof a firm and stable platform around the outer edges of the midsole with a slight friendly rebounding softsensation from the central Zip Foam core. Much of my feedback will be a comparison from the first model to the update. The security and hold are good despite the volume and even for my low volume foot. I loved how the heel cup provided support for the heel. And ultimately, what I got was a shoe that is better than its predecessor, but once again hard to choose in the already-crowded max cushion category. Quick Strides: RTR Team Testing Notes, Race Reports and More! Like I said - no complaints! The Invincible is more flexible with a final distinct toe off effect off its soft front while the Phantom has a longer flex and more front snap at faster paces although not it is not as agile and quick feeling due to its geometry and additional weight. This is a great update to take pressure off of the Achilles. Michael: This is a foregone conclusion, but its not so much the faults of the Topo that doomed it, but rather the excellence of the Shift. All Rights Reseved . Full Stack Height: 33mm heel / 28mm forefoot (plus 3mm from v1), 5 mm drop, Available now including our partners Running Warehouse here. - Theme by Dyvelopment, * Your email address will not be published, JUNK T&F High School Headbands Collection. The stack height of 28mm/33mm provides plenty of cushion for long runs. The Phantom 2 has enough rubber on the outsole for buffed, even surfaces (off pavement), but the MTN Racer 2 is obviously a better technical trail choice. Approx. With the Phantom 2 we get an engineered mesh upper with no overlays whatsoever. While higher drop the Phantom feels similar in terms of drop roll and toe off as Altra does a better job with the Inner Flex up front than Topo as Phantom is stiffer but also has a fmore responsive approach which favors faster paces in the Phantom 2. The stack height of 28mm/33mm provides plenty of cushion for long runs. 10 Comparisons, Brooks Glycerin 20 Multi Tester Reviews: 4 versions with energetic DNA Loft v3 supercritical foam. I found it to be a comfortable choice and recommend the shoes for runners who keep shoving their feet in narrow toe-box trainers. I think some runners can use the Phantom 2 for a variety of runs, although for me they work best in the easy, long-run category. Like all mesh, it may get warm during 90-100 degree Fahrenheit runs. The fact that the laces are built into the tongue and then lace through the upper portion of the shoe sometimes made it frustrating as the laces would fall into the shoe as it went onto the foot. Renee: As a daily trainer and performance shoe, most runners will likely prefer the Pegasus 37. Toni: This shoe is a more stable neutral shoe. Runners of all distances and experience levels, walkers wanting more cushion, folks on their feet for long periods of time in need of cushion and support. Buttery Smooth & Versatile! Increasing the stack height in the ZipFoam truly makes this shoe feel like a high-end cushioned distance running shoe. The shoe did have a wider feel to it on the ball of the foot portion. The shape of the upper appears different than other shoes I've worn. At slower paces it is a bit lumbering, flat and low feeling but not mushy soft as v1 was. My favorite update is the overall fit. I run primarily on pavement (roads, trails) or the treadmill. Sam: The Phantom is Topos max cushion daily trainer. Both uppers are excellent in their hold with the Phantom a bit more luxurious in feel and with more toe box room. This also gives it a more orthotic look to the overall shoe. Renee: The duel-density ZipFoam is meant to deliver a cushioned, responsive ride. I think thats a fair description. With a big stack of 33/28, 3mm more than v1 so we are way up there in cushion, and a now more dynamic combination of Zip Foam and EVA this is a big shoe that likes to move along. With 28mm of cushion positioned between the runner and the ground, the Phantom 2 by Topo Athletic is in it for the long haul. I like lighter shoes too, so between the two, the 880 is my choice. Brighton, MI, Copyright 2022 Running Lab - Powered by Lightspeed With a big stack of 33/28, 3mm more than v1 so we are way up there in cushion, and a now more dynamic combination of Zip Foam and EVA this is a big shoe that likes to move along. $140. Im generally a fan of firmer shoes, and expected the ZipFoam blend here to really work with me - but I ended up having mixed feelings. In version 1 the all ZipFoam midsole in combination with the geometry and 5mm dropwas a miss for me with a ponderous quite mushy and hard to move along ride. More drop could also help by removing a bit of the front stack and moving it to the rear. 2021 Best of Running & Contributors Year in Review Articles. I would contrast this shoe to the New Balance 1080v11, which provided too much cushiony "give" that it caused foot discomfort. I had to increase my shoe size in the original Phantom due to the firm overlaid toe cap. : Massive in appearance from its giant toe box and featureless big midsole sidewalls, the Phantom 2 clearly conveys a vibe that you will be well protected and in great comfort. With Phantom 2, the overall midsole becomes firmer, and certainly firmer and also more responsive than Phantom 1. The cushion level stays consistent regardless of the mileage. Even in a 7.5, I have plenty of room and the upper is overall generous in size without compromising a secure fit. Geoff: I experienced no issues with feeling unstable. Its upper while fine does not have the polish and combination of roominess and solid hold of the Phantom. The midsole is firm, but not hard, with some give for cushion. Sam: While I said the slow paced ride is a bit flat and low feeling this is in no way due to the shoe bottoming out due to inadequate rubber. 39 year oldWears men's size 10My background in running isn't a very exciting one :). The Phantom 2 has a very generous toe box, even Topo standards, so runners might consider a half size down. Even in a 7.5, I have plenty of room and the upper is overall generous in size without compromising a secure fit. The responsiveness comes from the somewhat firm midsole (firm, not hard). I found it to be a comfortable choice and recommend the shoes for runners who keep shoving their feet in narrow toe-box trainers. Geoff: Overall, I loved the general feel of the Topo Phantom 2. Renee: The outsole has enough rubber to provide a nice balance underfoot. Due to its lighter weight and wider pace range for me the More v3 is a more versatile if shakier riding choice. Theres rubber where you need it (and then some), and tack on the road is also superb. 8 Comparisons, New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Trainer Multi Tester Review: Carbon Plated, Super Max Cushion. I was very pleased to see that while the overallweight of 10.7 oz / 303 g stayed about the same the overall stack height increased 3mm to a stout 33mm heel / 28mm forefoot with still in the mix Topo usual copious durable rubber. I've been running for 5 years. Five years ago, I started running as a means to end a poor lifestyle. Even in a half size smaller, I have much more room in the toe box in the Phantom. The ride is comforting for easy long runs for me, and the stack height works well in that regard as well. That said, if I need more stack height on uneven surfaces, Ill choose the Phantom 2 for its lower drop and greater height. I wore a womens size 7.5 in both, having more space in the Phantoms as compared to the MTN Racer 2. I wore a size 7.5 in the Phantom and size 8 in the 880. I am a heel striker at slow paces so those who midfoot or forefoot strike at slower paces likely will experience less of that flat feel. Sam: Phantom 2 is firmer, more responsive, more cushioned and a faster shoe. While Topo fans will no doubt be happy with the Phantom 2s improvements over last year, I think a lot of runners could get away with only using the Cyclone. The white foam being the more standard EVA as isthe blue seen at the forefoot in the picture below which is painted to mask that big 28mm full stack height up front. What I love about this shoe is it NEVER GIVES UP. The fit for my medium width feet is true to size, verysecure, and with of course notable toe box room. Sam: I am going to take a different tack and say while yes you will notice the MTN Racer 2 Vibram MegaGrip in the mix on the road and a touch less cushion as we have a 30/25 stack vs 33/28 for Phantom and a somewhat more secure if not as plush upper, the MTN Racer 2 is the first Topo I have run with a nice front rocker (missing from Phantom) and is clearly in the mix on the road, with a considerably easier transition from the heel even on road and even weighs a bit less. I also would highly recommend this shoe for anyone that is looking for a shoe that is a more natural fit providing more room in the toe box. The length was good. The upper is a now fairly common engineered mesh that is comfortable and allows for air to enter through the toe box. 12 Comparisons, Changeover of RoadTrailRun News Feed to follow.it. This was a welcome change. The midfoot sometimes felt a little tight. Sam: Well over one ounce and $40 lighter, the Axon relies on a well (better executed) rigid rocker to move along handling slower paces better than Phantom for me and faster paces quite close if with less pop and response. Overall the stack height increases a big 3mm without an increase in weight. I recall my first run in these shoes and felt great afterwards. : While I said the slow paced ride is a bit flat and low feeling this is in no way due to the shoe bottoming out due to inadequate rubber. I found the mid foot and heel security to be good. The shape appears as a more block (squared off) shape. The security and hold are good despite the volume and even for my low volume foot. Michael: No complaints from me with regards to the outsole - I only put about 30 miles on the Phantom 2 (or a morning runs worth, for Renee) but certainly didnt experience any wear. Sam: The Invincible has a way bouncier and softer (and more fun and dynamic) ZoomX ride on about one ounce lighter platform with equivalent cushion. The front mesh is soft and pliable with the toe bumper high and long but thankfully also not extending back over the top of the toes. One of the best of 2021 if not a light upper. I'm not sure this shoe would work for everyone - but it worked for me. Renee: The ride is comforting for easy long runs for me, and the stack height works well in that regard as well. I was eager to see what kind of difference in the ridethis big change made. By the end of 2016, I had lost 65 pounds and felt the best I felt in a long time - mainly due to incorporating running/exercise into my life. Its pace range is somewhat limited for me to faster paces as at slower paces they are flat feeling with the broad forefoot somewhat hard to getup onto. People that need space due to width, bunions, hammer toes or better toe splay. The shoes looks very wide throughout, including a massive toe box. I also discovered I experiences more of this issue while running on the treadmill vs. road running. The rear of its upper is very similar in its hold, a bit more secure while upfront its toe box is for sure narrower and shorter than Phantoms. Sam: Very similar in cushion feel, the Shift has yet more stack height at 38/24 of PWRRUN a TPU EVA blends and ends up a touch firmer overall. I wore a size 8 in the Pegasus as compared to a size 7.5 in the Phantom. and the lockdown to be great. I think the low-but-not-zero drop is a wise and practical choice that helps you utilize that wider toebox and more natural footstrike while still avoiding some of the harshness that can come from a zero-drop trainer - especially one designed for high-mileage training. Occasionally on longer runs (5+ miles), this area of my foot (primarily right foot) had some discomfort. Paces, times, distances change. The higher drop of the Triumph is clearly felt as a positive at slower paces vs. the Phantom but as the pace picks up its softness and weight becomes cumbersome in comparison. I would not hesitate to run 20+ mile training runs with the Phantom 2. The 5mm drop helps with stability and stride, particularly when I am running on country roads. When you lace up in the Topo Phantom 2, the step in feel is incredibly cushioned. Thanks! Michael: Last years Phantom had its benefits, to be sure, but was ultimately a bit of a middling performer for me. However, I wouldn't let the aesthetics deter anyone from the functionality of the shoe - because it is a great feeling shoe. I think ultimately I do prefer the Peg 37, though, because its more lightweight profile and terrific upper (not to knock the Topo!) The More v3 pulls off the low drop transition better than the Phantom at slower paces with a smoother easier less flat feeling if a bit wobblier flow. If you like the Zephyr and want a more cushioned version of the same ride the Phantom can make a good pairing. For pavement runners, this will increase durability and prevent a bottom-out feel on long runs. I ran the Phantom 2 on runs from 3 to 17 miles on pavement and dirt/gravel. Version 1 (RTR Review) had an all Zip Foam midsole. I'm a casual runner putting in 35-50 miles per week. As the pace picks up and I get off the heel things change quite dramatically with a dynamic, stable, and responsive pop off the broad forefoot. At times there was some discomfort, especially during longer runs. The shoe has a bit of flex up front so it is not a completely rigid rocker profile geometry. As far as uppers Phantoms blows Torin 4 Plush away from memory. What I did like was that, despite knowing that the Phantom 2 was in double-digit ounce range, I never felt as though I was strapping bricks underfoot. Like I said - no complaints! I would highly recommend this shoe to similar runners as myself. I have no strong negatives forthis shoe for what it is. The rocker geometry of the Shift and final Speed Roll has them handling all paces t better than Phantom for me despite a slight 0.3 oz weight penalty. Daily trainers without a super midsole might lack flare and excitement, but I need at least one in my rotation, preferably one that can handle long distances on pavement and gravel. Daily trainers without a super midsole might lack flare and excitement, but I need at least one in my rotation, preferably one that can handle long distances on pavement and gravel. 10 Comparisons, Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 Multi Tester Review: Relentlessly Forward! The cushion for both shoes felt supportive with enough give to feel stable but not so much where it caused discomfort. While admittedly this next point may factor into all of what Ive just put forth above, I will be the first to say I like the 5mm offset that Topo designed here. I think the rear midfoot geometry needs some work with more sculpting of the sidewalls, more of a rear rocker and a more extensive central groove to get the foot moving forward. The shoes are a bit heavy, but not drastically so compared to Other high cushion, durable trainers. A softer, more dynamic midsole may benefit the Phantom here, if its achievable - but the Phantom should still have a place in the lineup for Topo fans seeking a cushioned, supportive ride for the long haul. Sam: We have a tale of two rides here. While admirable that Topo kept the weight essentially the same with more shoe underfoot at 10.7 oz, the weight is up there for my daily training preferences. There was no slipping in this shoe. The anatomy of the cup plus the heel counter provided additional support for the back of the foot. Sam: The More v3 checks in at 0.7 oz less than the Phantom on a 33/29mm stack height so almost exactly the same stack height as the Phantom with 1mm more upfront. The Phantom 2 has a very generous toe box, even Topo standards, so runners might consider a half size down. I've run mostly in Altra shoes in recent years, but I am currently considering adding a couple of Topo shoes to my rotation (the Cyclone for faster sessions and the Phantom 2 for long runs) just to spare my legs from some of the zero drop strain when running fast or longer. I do not have a Topo-shaped foot, so the toe box and roll forward do not perfectly compliment my foot and natural stride. Version 1 (, mens 10.7 oz / 303g US9 womens 8.88 oz / 252g US8, Available now including our partners Running Warehouse. They need to be replaced and I wonder if the Phantom 2 would make a good alternative? I used the Phantom 2 for moderate to easy paces, and Im not too picky about upper security for those types of runs. The midsole has enough zip (as the name would suggest) to it, but I really only noticed that at quicker tempos. Sam: The May releasing Ride 9 has an excellent smooth flow at all paces on a somewhat firmer riding but springier midsole with plenty of front flex. My favorite thing about running is that it can be a lifelong journey. RTR German, Spanish, French, Danish, Polish Reviews, Nike Zoom Fly 5 Review (100 km): ZoomX Core and New Plate Shifts the Focus! better than its predecessor, but once again hard to choose in the already-crowded max cushion category. I've been cultivating the running and walking community managing the Running Lab in downtown Brighton since 2015. The shoes are a bit heavy for my preference, but with the stack height and cushion, the shoes deliver a fair balance as a long distance trainer. I do not think this will change the security of feel. Geoff: I'm a big fan of Brooks - but have welcomed other brands to try new experiences. While Topo fans will no doubt be happy with the Phantom 2s improvements over last year, I think a lot of runners could get away with, Enjoyed this post? Torin 4.5 Plush is considerably lighter and that is felt. At all paces the amount of cushion balances lots of shock free protection with some pop. Weight: mens 10.7 oz / 303g US9 womens 8.88 oz / 252g US8, Samples: mens 10.4 oz / 295g US8.5 womens 8.88 oz / 252g US8. : Like Sam said with the Zephyr, I think the Phantom and the Cyclone do make adequate training companions - the Cyclone for quicker runs, the Phantom for anything easier - but the middling performance of the Phantom 2 where it should excel (slow running) make me question that paradigm slightly. My longest run was only 17 miles on hilly pavement, but my legs and feet were completely fresh afterward. I would add they make a supremely comfortable walking and all day wear shoe. Michael: I cant say I was wowed at first unboxing; relatively heavy and equally plain-looking, the Phantom 2 isnt quite the I-cant-wait-to-put-miles-on-this trainer that Topos Cyclone was, when we tested back at the turn of the year. This shoe is made for many folks! Its extremely well-done, and probably the Phantom 2s best feature. The Phantom 2 is available now from Topo Athletic here & from our partners below. So I assist 5 charter schools in Michigan with anything related to their accounting records. The Phantom 2 is a solid daily trainer/easy long run shoe that may go unnoticed because (for whatever reason) Topo does not get as much love as some other major shoe brands. Seriously, the Endorphin Shift is, for my money, the best maximalist cushion trainer yet, and an exceedingly fun shoe for both slow and fast running. It gives me confidence that while I am fatiguing on my run, my shoes aren't. The heel collar of the shoe has a very soft mesh verses the stitched in padding in the heel collar. Thanks for the review! Even though the support is foam, it didn't feel so "squishy" that stability was compromised. So much well held foot splay, a secure mid foot, and locked down heel all in an upper with no overlays with the well implemented heel clip and toe bumper doing all the heavy lockdown lifting and with the whole upper delightfully comfortable. The outsole has enough rubber to provide a nice balance underfoot. Article by Renee Krusemark, Michael Ellenberger, and Sam Winebaum. (-.75 weight, -.35 high volume fit/very wide toe box,-.10 best used only for slow, long runs). Renee: Both the 880v11 and Phantom 2 occupy a place as daily trainers that work best for me on easy long runs. Many other brands (for me) sometimes pinch toes too much which leads to discomfort. I tipped my hand in the Midsole section, above, but Ill reiterate - while I think ZipFoam lives true to its name at quicker paces (no small feat, for a higher-stack trainer), in providing a zippy, nimble, and often fun ride I found it considerably more lackluster at slower paces, without any shaping or rocker to move you forward, and compounded with a slightly firmer-than-desired blend of midsole foam. Weve seen Topo Athletic absolutely hit a home run with its 2021, , so my hopes were high, but my expectations in check with the Phantom 2. Overall the ride through the combination of firmer stabilizing side walls surrounding the softer center Zip Foam is very stable and consistent. Sam: With about a 33/25mm stack height and a 8 mm drop vs the 33/28mm here the Saucony is easier to transition and run at slower paces but lags the Phantom as the pace picks up. My runs have ranged from 3 miles to 15 miles. The Pegasus is much lighter too. I work in the educational finance industry as an accounting manager. We have a summer cottage there. I like a wide toe box, but the Phantom 2 has too much room for me. Renee: The Phantom 2 is a solid daily trainer and/or easy day long run shoe and is worth a try. A softer, more dynamic midsole may benefit the Phantom here, if its achievable - but the Phantom should still have a place in the lineup for Topo fans seeking a cushioned, supportive ride for the long haul. Between the midsole, stack height, low drop, comfortable upper, and good outsole coverage the Phantom 2 delivers for me. Now of course, those are considerably softer materials, and I didnt go in expecting pure squish here - but even in comparison to some harder midsoles available, I found the ZipFoam EVA combination a bit middling. I ran a lot of dirt/gravel with the Phantom 2, and the outsole provides enough traction (not great, but good) and some comfort. The ZipFoam provides an awesome high cushioned experience without a high heel to toe offset. Now that has been removed in the Phantom 2, I find the fit is true to size. When you need to be moved by nature, go run. Truly amazing the upper comfort for me,Sam, Editor. The stabilizing TPU heel overlay/piece is reduced in size to a clip instead of a full external wrap. Zip Foam is Topos resilient somewhat bouncy and soft EVA/TPU blend foam. Durability should be excellent. Get the Saucony. 7 Comparisons, Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 Multi Tester Review: Speed Meets New Comfort & Versatility! For pavement runners, this will increase durability and prevent a bottom-out feel on long runs. I used the Phantom 2 for moderate to easy paces, and Im not too picky about upper security for those types of runs. Its pace range is somewhat limited for me to faster paces as at slower paces they are flat feeling with the broad forefoot somewhat hard to getup onto. I do not find the toe box of the 880 constricting, but wide footer runners might. The ride is softer and bouncier overall as unlike Phantom there is no outer carrier of firmer foam and as such it is slightly less stable as well. Nothing wrong with v1's upper but v2 with approximately the same fit is more comfortable and softer on the foot. While Phantom out does Axon a faster paces in terms of pop and response and likely longevity it ends up less pace versatile and heavier feeling with a less effective geometry. How would you say it compares to Altras high cushion road shoes (Paradigm and Torin Plush)? Michael: This is a close call for me; the Topo Phantom 2 and Pegasus both run a little firm (for different reasons - the Nikes being the Air Zoom units underfoot). I would say there was a less cushiony feel here than with the New Balance 1080v11, but there's definitely a supportive feeling. FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns, Join VIP Family, Get Free Shipping and 15% in VIP, All Reviews: Road & Trail Run Shoes, Gear & Tech By Brand, Latest Run Shoe and Gear Reviews & Articles, 2022 Running Intros and Previews. : The duel-density ZipFoam is meant to deliver a cushioned, responsive ride. I think thats a fair description. Topo Athletic paired ZipFoam cushion in the midsole with a 5mm heel-to-toe drop for a natural, plush running experience. Toni: The Topo Phantom 2 would be a great comparison to the Altra Torin Plush, Hoka Clifton, Nike React Miler, and Saucony Triumph. However, I don't think the shoe was broken in fully to the shape and contours of my feet. Michael: I tipped my hand in the Midsole section, above, but Ill reiterate - while I think ZipFoam lives true to its name at quicker paces (no small feat, for a higher-stack trainer), in providing a zippy, nimble, and often fun ride I found it considerably more lackluster at slower paces, without any shaping or rocker to move you forward, and compounded with a slightly firmer-than-desired blend of midsole foam. While admittedly this next point may factor into all of what Ive just put forth above, I will be the first to say I like the 5mm offset that Topo designed here. The midsole is firm, but not hard, with some give for cushion. While the geometry doesn't change much, expect for 3mm more stack height at the same weight as v1, the ride does and for the better for me as I found v1 ponderous and overly soft. Cushioning is about equal with the Phantom firmer overall. It's a great way to meet new people of similar interests. With a low volume foot shape, I do not get a perfect foot landing with the shoe shape, but thats a personal note. All in all, the upper was comfortable even if not as pleasing to the eye. I ran a few miles mixing in 10k paces, and the shoes worked fine for that too despite the weight. Hi All, thanks again for another great review. The only reinforcements at mid foot are raised thread like areas of knit surrounding denser but not thicker panels of the same material. There is plenty of thick durable rubber front to back. The ride is similar in that this is a shoe that favors faster off the heels running as Zephyr also feels low and flat at slower paces. This made the ride of the Phantom 2 more cushioned in comparison to the responsive toe spring of the previous model. 0.4 oz heavier (and felt) It has a softer all TPU PWRRUN+midsole with some springy bounce with its outsole providing some stability. No complaints from me with regards to the outsole - I only put about 30 miles on the Phantom 2 (or a morning runs worth, for Renee) but certainly didnt experience any wear. And ultimately, what I got was a shoe that. New Balance Fuel Cell MD-X Track Spike Review: Car Testbericht: ASICS Noosa Tri 13 - Das Pollock-Gem Nike 2021 Road Trainers Comparison Review: Zoom Pe Testbericht: Topo Athletic Ultraventure 2 Einer Light Max Cushion Road Trainers Comparison Review: Avis et Impressions: ON Running Cloudultra (French). The shoes were comfortable, provided enough support, did not slip on the heel, laces felt tight enough without feeling restrictive or cutting off circulation. I'd recommend if you prefer moderate cushion without the plush feel of some foam. At faster paces while the Phantom forefoot has a decisive responsive feel the More v3 has a bouncier impulse. Renee: The MTN Racer 2 makes a good trail companion to the Phantom 2. The toebox fit of the Topo Phantom 2 appears to be slightly wider due to the removal of the overlays in this region greatly making the fit less constrictive than the previous model. The cushioning was adequate. As for fit, Im between a womens 7.5 and 8 in most shoes, typically wearing a size 8. But one can always get that great feeling of accomplishment after a good run at any age. Hoka ONE ONE Clifton 8 vs. Mach 4 Comparison Video adidas Solarboost 3 Review: A stable performance! Michael: Im generally a fan of firmer shoes, and expected the ZipFoam blend here to really work with me - but I ended up having mixed feelings. Would you recommend getting the same size as I wear in the original? Renee: The Phantom 2 is a solid daily trainer/easy long run shoe that may go unnoticed because (for whatever reason) Topo does not get as much love as some other major shoe brands. At slower paces the Phantom is just fine but a bit low feeling, flat and back weighted with the broad forefoot not as easy to reach as I would like. A slightly softer blend might be a nice addition here. Not much feedback in this area. There is plenty of thick durable rubber front to back. : We have a tale of two rides here.

Sitemap 12

topo phantom 2 vs hoka clifton